Free trade has lifted mankind to a level of wealth that was recently unimaginable. In 1990, 38 percent of human beings lived in extreme poverty; today, that figure has fallen to 8 per cent, as previously closed African and Asian economies have joined the global market.

Yet, paradoxically, free trade has never been so out of fashion. Across the world, idealistic people march against trade deals, protest G20 summits, occupy stock exchanges, sincerely believing that, in doing so, they are standing up for the poor against multinational corporations – when, in reality, they are doing the opposite.

Politicians naturally respond to public opinion. We are witnessing a trade war between the world’s largest and second-largest economies. The Uruguay Round, concluded in 1994, was the last successful comprehensive multilateral trade negotiation. Until CPTPP, the last major regional trade deals were ASEAN and NAFTA, agreed in the early 1990s.

We need to recapture the moral case for open commerce. Free trade is not simply a way to buy cheaper iPhones. It is the ultimate instrument of poverty alleviation, conflict resolution and social justice.

IFT seeks to recapture the intellectual and moral case for free trade, and to change government policy toward revitalising the global economy. We pursue this through three dedicated work streams:


No one is born a free trader. We will use videos and online resources to explain the concepts of free trade in a way designed to appeal to sceptics – which is to say, to almost everyone. We also contribute to teaching University modules in economics, and host an in-house Summer School for future leaders.


We will reach out to businesses and interest groups around the world, particularly in developing countries. We will bring them together to look at specific ways in which eliminating tariff and non-tariff barriers will lead to general prosperity. We will publish country-by-country and sector-by-sector studies showing how FTAs will benefit participating economies.


We will use our extensive networks within governments to promote new trade agreements and to make sure that they focus on mutual recognition rather than standardisation – in other words, that they benefit consumers rather than producers. We will work closely with, though independently of, the UK’s Department for International Trade, with a focus on facilitating economic diplomacy internationally, and unilateral liberalisation at home too.





Scott Lincicome

@scottlincicome 15 hours ago

Wait, imports are good and tariffs are bad now? Has President Tariff Man seen this? twitter.com/WHNSC/status/1…

Robert Colvile

@rcolvile 17 hours ago

'The EU's farming policy is so bad, almost any change would be an improvement' - punchy from @eamonnives... capx.co/the-cap-is-lif…

Dr Anton Howes

@antonhowes yesterday

New must-read paper from Maksym Chepeliev and @D_A_Irwin (one of world experts on 19thC free trade). On the conse… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Tom Tugendhat

@TomTugendhat yesterday

Tariffs are a tax on the British people, not foreign products. Countries use them as a way for producers to deter f… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Guido Fawkes

@GuidoFawkes yesterday

EXCLUSIVE: Trade Department Appoints Free Market Trio as Advisers order-order.com/2020/11/30/exc… pic.twitter.com/nCYZMLz98J

Initiative for Free Trade

@IFTtweets yesterday

...leverage is not the only game in town. A number of smaller countries have been quietly and successfully practisi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…